Sky's Blog

This may be just an artifact of my personal experience, but I think I’m finding that the hotels offering “free Internet” are more often the low-priced hotels than the more expensive ones. At least in Paris and London.

It’s not uncommon to find a hotel over 250€ per night that has a 15€ or higher charge for Internet access. But in the hotels I frequent—I’m fine with just a bed with barely enough space to move around the edges, a shower, and Internet connection, for just over 100€ a night—it seems to be more common to have a free Internet connection included.

Perhaps this is a reflection of younger travelers looking for less-expensive hotels and being attracted like flies (there is one buzzing around my head at this instant here in Paris’ 5^eme where I am connected while sitting in the hotel lobby preparing to take the metro to a meeting) to hotels that provide connectivity.

And the true boon is that Skype on my iPhone can connect to the free wi-fi Internet and I can make Skype calls without having to purchase those “overseas” (and overpriced) mobile phone minutes! Quite a difference to spend USD$0.02 per minute rather than $1.29.

{Part of Sky’s series on using tech when traveling}

Now why would I say that? Google and Verizon announced yesterday (August 9, 2010) their joint statement on “an Open Internet.” [Verizon] [Google]

I can read the statement two ways. (continue reading…)

I guess you gotta wake up from the dream sooner or later. The iPhone was a really great advance, a phone with an integrated iPod, podcasting, visual voicemail, browsing, email and all the software gadgets. And the multi-touch screen clinched the deal. I have had a great two years with it—lots of exploration and fun. (Love those maps!)

But with the upgrade to iOS 4, my 3G iPhone is no longer usable for phone calls, and I’m having people call me on my landline, or just leave voicemail messages for me and I try to return them later on.

Can’t slide the green slide to answer button when a call is coming in. I touch it, try to slide, and it just sits there sucking its thumb. Slide, slide, slide…and it won’t budge. By the time it finally reacts, the call has gone to voicemail.

The Wall Street Journal online [July 28th] reported that (in their opinion) Apple is paying attention now and looking into the situation. I hope so, because I’m still looking at alternatives to this iPhone and to Apple in general, after 32 years of fanatically supporting (and purchasing) Apple products!

In my earlier trials and tribulations

I went to the Apple Genius bar and the genius told me to reset my phone to factory conditions. He wouldn’t even have a conversation with me about anything short of that. Just go home and reset—can’t anything for me.

Then I found other online solutions, none of which worked.

Then I started deleting apps – and after dropping about a dozen apps, the phone got better.

But I still can’t answer calls because of the balkiness!

Who has access to your email addresses and your email-writing history?

The Washington Post reported last week that the Obama administration is seeking to modify the 1993 Electronic Communications Privacy Act so that Internet service providers must turn over transaction records on email communications and possibly web browsing records, upon receipt of a “national security letter” from the FBI. This particular legal process doesn’t require review by a judge—unlike search warrants.^[1]

The law does not allow access to the contents of those emails without judicial oversight…only the more externally-visible addressing information, and that does tend to be what email systems log and archive. On the other hand, the term “electronic communication transactional records” which is what the government could require ISPs to divulge, is not defined in federal statutes, according to the Washington Post.^[2] And so it could conceivably be extended to include other person-to-person communications, such as social media contacts

This is the same process the Bush administration used, in the early 2000s, to ask libraries to turn over the records of books checked out by patrons, which was strongly resisted by librarians at that time.

Phone companies keep records of all of the numbers you call, and these are subject to the same access rules. This has never been a question, and most people in the US are probably at least marginally aware of this.

The real question isn’t whether someone is reading your email addresses and headers—it’s how they are interpreting the titles, subjects, and names of the people you are corresponding with. In the McCarthy era here in the US, you could be blacklisted for associating with the wrong people.

If you have an inquiring mind, would you want someone to judge you based on the titles of the books or publications you’re reading? Or the subjects and addressees of your email?

[2] The New York Times 30 July, 2010 — secondary report and opinion

A whole nother ancillary question is whether your ISP actually keeps these records or not. If they do not, are they then exempt from having to turn over any records, or will the government require that they keep such records in the future? Some ISPs intentionally do not keep certain kinds of records, which helps keep your use of certain services anonymous. And, for instance, I’d guess that very few ISPs, if any, keep records of your browsing history, and this makes it prohibitively difficult to document all of the web sites you’ve visited.